Fleet Ops: Fuel Efficiency
Events Calendar
1 Comments Share
EPA asks for stay in Navistar suit; OEM says no way

CHICAGO -- Navistar International is opposing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's request to postpone court proceedings on Navistar's lawsuit against the agency.

Navistar -- which, as it's well known by now -- is the only major truck OEM not using selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology in upcoming 2010 engines. It is suing the EPA for what it claims is the agency's betrayal of the agency's own stance in a official guidance issued 2001 that SCR would not be a feasible technology.

In particular, Navistar contends EPA is improperly allowing SCR systems to incorporate a 'ramped shutdown' feature in case the diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) required for SCR engines runs dry. Navistar likens this allowance to a "licence to pollute" and "pollution for convenience."

In late October, the EPA asked a federal appeals court to grant a 60-day stay (which, incidentally, would expire just as the Jan. 1, 2010 emissions regulations take effect). The delay would give the agency time to revise the original guidance in order to address Navistar's concerns, EPA says.

In court filings, EPA also mentioned that the 2001 guidance is not binding and was only meant to advise truck OEMs of potentially acceptable solutions that could meet the agency's 2010 emissions regulations.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Navistar responded to the EPA's request by calling it "a pointless strategic maneuver."

"EPA has known that tinkering with the guidances will not address the issues Navistar has raised in this litigation."

Navistar's opposition to SCR as an approved 2010 engine solution has led to some heated exchanges between the Chicago-based company and its competitors in the heavy-duty truck market.

This past summer, Navistar attempted to block rival truckmakers from intervening in the suit against EPA. 

In response, officials from pro-SCR manufacturers privately questioned Navistar's staunch opposition to SCR when the company is using that technology in international markets.

The appeals court has yet to rule on the EPA's request for a stay.

 
Email Editor     Comment Below
Rate this Article!
We Recommend:
Popular this Week:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Social Activity


(optional)

(optional)

(optional)

Notify me of other comments on this story (requires email and password)


* Please type the letters above exactly as they appear:  

Please Note:

While we value your feedback, please avoid profane or personal attacks. You should know that if your comment contains libelous, prejudicial or just plain wrong statements, it will be deleted.

SHAWN G MARCIL

Rating
-2
30
32
Just like the Government.....trying to buy themselves time when they find a flaw in their policies. Just like all their other policies....they find out it is flawed, now they need to buy themselves time to think of a way out and still look credible. I hope Navistar holds firm. All these emmisions laws are a load of crap anyway. Save the environment by giving us unreliable engines that drink fuel like it is going out of style. Right on. The engine and policy makers can feed you all the propaganda they want about how well these new motors perform, but my bank account will prove otherwise.

Report Abuse

Video Reel