News: Business Environment
4 Comments Share
WSIB Rates Could Sky-Rocket, says Bradley

TORONTO — A committee established by the Ontario Trucking Association (OTA) to guide input in the development of a long-term funding strategy for the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) announced that the containment of premium rate increases is on the top of their to-do list.

In May, the WSIB released the Funding Fairness Report (FFR) that, according to the OTA, said WSIB premiums would be increasing and that premiums should be based on actual costs — regardless of affordability. Each industry rate group, the report advised, should pay the full current and future costs of new claims.

The trucking rate group is the largest of all industry rate groups, explained OTA President David Bradley. The challenge is not whether employers will be forced to pay more, Bradley said, but rather how much more.

“Our aim will be to try to get the WSIB to ensure that rate increases are consistent with actuarial science and are transparent, reasonable, incremental and predictable, without government interference in the rate and benefits setting process,” Bradley said.

“The ultimate goal is a WSIB system that is sustainable, stable and fair to both injured workers and to employers who fund the system in its entirety.”

The OTA WSIB Committee is also looking to maintain a rate group solely for the trucking sector, as well as an experience rating where poorly performing employers pay higher rates than good performers.

The OTA said that as that trucking was one of the industries that pioneered experience rating in Ontario, the trucking sector should be asked to participate in any review of experience rating WSIB might undertake.

“A properly funded system is essential, but revenues are only part of the problem,” Bradley said.

One of those problems is the exclusion of expenditure considerations in the FFR report, a move that the OTA and other groups protested. The decision to leave out a review of WSIB's costs caused the OTA to go as far as recommending private insurance as an alternative to WSIB coverage.

“The system is broken,” Bradley said bluntly. “And the WSIB does not have a good track record when it comes to fixing its problems. They have the opportunity to get the program back on track, but we are concerned that without also reviewing its expenditures, the pricing of WSIB coverage could sky-rocket, making it and Ontario employers uncompetitive.”

 
Email Editor     Comment Below
Rate this Article!
Filed Under: WSIB rates OTA David Bradley
We Recommend:
Popular this Week:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Social Activity


(optional)

(optional)

(optional)

Notify me of other comments on this story (requires email and password)


* Please type the letters above exactly as they appear:  

Please Note:

While we value your feedback, please avoid profane or personal attacks. You should know that if your comment contains libelous, prejudicial or just plain wrong statements, it will be deleted.

Anonymous

Rating
4
37
33
A wsib employee aquaintance of mine told me that wsib has a bed bug problem! LOL Oh & by the way, wsib ajudicators are making $100,000 a year & the majority of them are lazy spoiled &^%%%^&*# so I'm told

Anonymous

Rating
5
34
29
If WSIB would stop wasting money on projects that don't work them employer's premiums would be considerably low. They wasted at least $110 million dollars (your dollars) on the ICAM project (google it)then scrapped it! Then they have former employee's who have retired com in on short term basis & pay them $125 per hour........

Andy

Rating
3
40
37
What kills me is that everyone seams to agree that the whole thing is not working, yet no one is willing to make real changes. Audit the WSIB and make them accountable for every penny they through away, make it much harder to get paid, hold the injured person as accountable as the employer, why is it never the employees fault, maybe they should be more careful. Allow employers to pay the employee for lost time when everyone knows the employer was negligent (why not it's cheaper than a claim). Don't pay the employee for the first 3 days of lost time (when it's debatable who's fault it is). Don't discourage the people that want to work from working, when all you have to do is sit at home and get paid why go to work. Making WSIB optional is something that needs to be actually seriously looked at. I know these things are much easier said than done but this is where we are, and until people that can actually do something start doing something and not just talking about it. I honestly believe things will get much worse for both employers and employees before they get any better.

Anonymous

Rating
-3
37
40
The WSIB system is broken. It is broken from the point of veiw of injured people and companies who by law must pay into it. Truck owners could so a lot to reduce injuries by spec'ing better seats among other things and insisting that drivers are drivers and don't handle freight. It is a well established fact that sitting long periods, especially with the vibrations of equipment, is bad for your back and it is even worse for it to then jump out and handbomb freight because some idiot wants a product 1 high instead of 6 high like it arrived on the pallet. Equipment is a real big issue, it is amazing how many are still using spring suspensions on trailers for instance.

Report Abuse

Video Reel