News: Business Environment
Events Calendar
2 Comments Share
Cat recalling 925 2002-07 truck engines: REVISED

PEORIA, Ill. -- Caterpillar is not recalling 590,000 on-highway and off-road diesel engines, as stated in the original version of this article earlier today. In fact, the number of engines actually recalled is just 925. The company will, however, pay a $2.55 million penalty to resolve alleged Clean Air Act violations for shipping some 590,000 engines without the correct emissions controls.

Caterpillar allegedly failed to comply with emission control reporting and engine-labeling requirements.

A Caterpillar spokesperson explains the situation this way:

"EPA's complaint states that Caterpillar shipped 590,000 engines separate from their aftertreatment devices and/or with incorrect fuel programming software to OEMs. In the vast majority of cases of separate shipment, the engines were matched with the correct aftertreatment devices when installed in vehicles. As EPA's complaint states, approximately 925 of those 590,000 engines  were not in their certified configuration when  the equipment or vehicles they powered were delivered to end users and placed into service. Per paragraph 9 in the consent decree, Caterpillar is not required to recall 590,000 engines, but rather is required to recall  approximately 925 engines.  All but a small percentage of those 925 recalled engines have already been corrected."

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a settlement with Caterpillar last week.

From February 2002 to November 2006, the government says, Caterpillar shipped the 590,000 engines to more than 50 original equipment manufacturers, engines that were not equipped with the aftertreatment devices and/or fuel programming software that were present on Cat engines that had been certified by EPA.

As a result, says the EPA, the engines emitted excess nitrogen oxides and particulate matter.

In cases where the aftertreatment device was the problem, the table of engines in the legal complaint notes that the aftertreatment devices were shipped separately from the engines.

"Caterpillar denies any wrongdoing, but does agree that the decree represents a good faith effort between the parties to resolve their differences and avoid potentially lengthy litigation," said Cat in a statement. "Caterpillar is committed to following the terms of the decree."

The company noted that many of the engines in question have already been fixed as part of an earlier recall, reports ENR.

Caterpillar will recall the affected engines and install the correct aftertreatment devices and re-program the fuel-injector and fuel-map settings. This recall will continue until all engines with incorrect catalysts, fuel injectors or fuel-map settlings have been addressed or until December 31, 2011, whichever is earlier.

In addition to the recall, Caterpillar will mitigate excess emissions through permanent retirement of banked emission credits on the 925 recalled engines.

The proposed settlement is subject to a 30-day public comment period and final court approval.

-- via Truckinginfo.com

 
Email Editor     Comment Below
Rate this Article!
We Recommend:
Popular this Week:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Social Activity


(optional)

(optional)

(optional)

Notify me of other comments on this story (requires email and password)


* Please type the letters above exactly as they appear:  

Please Note:

While we value your feedback, please avoid profane or personal attacks. You should know that if your comment contains libelous, prejudicial or just plain wrong statements, it will be deleted.

G CURRIE

Rating
1
29
28
The California Air Emmission rules are causing more polution and use of Carbon mainly diesel Fuel. My 2002 Peterbilt with a Cummins ISX 600 HP got better Fuel Mileage than a Brand new 2012 Kenworth with a Cummins ISX 485 HP WHICH ALSO HAS THE ADDED COST OF [def] --DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID that I am driving now and I got the load delivered a lot faster also with the old 600 HP Cummins. Gord Currie

Anonymous

Rating
-3
34
37
This Artticle is incorrect. There were less than 1000 engines in the recall and 80 percent were already recalled.

Report Abuse

Video Reel