News: Business Environment
Events Calendar
9 Comments Share
Chiquita Goes Green on Oilsands, Canada Split on Issue

EDMONTON — The only fruit we usually think about around this time of year is clementine oranges, but the last seven days have seen a country split down the middle of an environmental debate kicked off by Chiquita bananas.

In a November letter to ForestEthics, Chiquita vice-president Manuel Rodriguez wrote that the company was "committed to directing our transportation providers to avoid, where possible, fuels from tarsands refineries and to adopt a strategy of continuous improvement towards the elimination of those fuels."

And Canadians went ape, with EthicalOil.org leading the charge on one side — calling on Canadians to ban Chiquita products — and various environmentalist groups on the other.

While ForestEhthics.org has listed other companies that have "boycotted" Canada's oil, the banana king has taken a solid hit given its history of being a less than sweet company.

The fruit company has denied that it is trying to boycott the oilsands and is simply encouraging truckers "where possible" to use "alternative fuels with a lower carbon footprint that have not been derived from refineries that utilize oilsands."

The Toronto Sun reported that CTA president and chief executive David Bradley, in a letter to Chiquita, said truckers can't know which fuels have oilsands content, and even if they did, drivers would have to take the first filling station available regardless.

Bradley also asked the company for an "unequivocal" statement about whether the company supports a ban on the use of "oilsands fuel" in shipping its products to market.

Chiquita spokesman Ed Loyd said that "Contrary to some press reports, Chiquita is not banning or boycotting Canadian fuel," he said. "Chiquita currently utilizes, and will continue to utilize, Canadian fuel sources."

Kathryn Marshall, spokeswoman for EthicalOil.org, however, is still saying Chiquita's move amounts to a boycott.

"You can word it any way that you want, but if your goal is to not use Canadian oilsands oil, that's a boycott."
 

 
Email Editor     Comment Below
Rate this Article!
Filed Under: banana chiquita truckers oil sands.
We Recommend:
Popular this Week:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Social Activity


(optional)

(optional)

(optional)

Notify me of other comments on this story (requires email and password)


* Please type the letters above exactly as they appear:  

Please Note:

While we value your feedback, please avoid profane or personal attacks. You should know that if your comment contains libelous, prejudicial or just plain wrong statements, it will be deleted.

Marz

Rating
-1
25
26
Chiquita has gone Bananas

Guy

Rating
2
24
22
I think it's time that business stick to their OWN business. And stay out of politics altogether. But being so, this US Trucker will support his neighbor (Canada) and boycott Chiquita's (products) altogether. And I also support the Canadian Pipeline to us in the US.

Anonymous

Rating
-1
22
23
natives pick there bananas for next to nothing and they have the audacity to complain about the oil that delivers them. please leave them on the dock to rot.

Dave

Rating
-2
23
25
This environmental quackery goes on, even though we see less of this nonsense daily. Oil is by far the best source of energy, we will never run out of it (it has nothing whatever to do with fossils)and if we were smart, we'd use it in more applications. We need to stop the Enviro crowd from forcing up our fuel prices.

M Paddock

Rating
-7
19
26
I wonder how much of a premium Mr. Chiquita might be willing to pay to have us spend the time and energy to source out the "clean fuel" he would like us to burn at who knows what additional cost. Somehow I doubt it would be much. Alternatively he could buy a bunch of trucks, hire a bunch of drivers and deliver all his own bananas using what ever fuel he likes. I don't see that happening either.

ROGER SMITH

Rating
1
23
22
It seems like a noble but misguided effort on the part of Chiquita. Tarsands oll is without a reasonable doubt, harmful to all of us. It is an egregious polluter. The impact of carbon emissions is upon us now and getting more harmful every day. There are few credible people left who would argue that global warming from carbon emissions is not the root cause of accelerated climate change that is affecting the entire planet negatively. On the other side of the coin is North Americans buying oil from politically unstable countries, resulting in wars and the resultant costs and human deaths/injuries. And of course, the Tarsands bring economic prosperity to Alberta and Canada as a whole - a good thing. But the trucker at the fuel pump has no way of knowing the source of their diesel fuel. Perhaps an awareness campaign would have been a better way of making the point - tractor-trailers are rolling billboards - trailer wraps, bumper stickers etc that would inform the public about the dirty Alberta oil. And there are conservation actions that truckers can take right now to reduce fossil/tarsands oil - aerodynamics, idling reduction, trip/route planning, lower road speeds and much more. Or, better still, insist on the government making biodiesel available - it is a clean burning direct replacement for dirty fossil oil that is derived from plants. And these plants can be grown here in North America. High quality biodiesel which is a direct replacement for conventional diesel, which has been tested in Canada for more than a decade now successfully, adapted for cold weather use is available here and now. It must still be blended with conventional diesel, but it would reduce our dependance greatly. The Tarsands are trying to improve their bad image. But covering up the problem doesn't make it go away. And from what I know, they seem to be working diligently on methods of making their processes less damaging to our planet. Our government should be taking steps to force them to clean their act up before we offer the product to the world. Or, our government could be purchasing offsetting carbon credits that would go carbon reduction projects elsewhere, thereby mitigating the net effect. But they don't. Instead, a lot of oil companies and others in Alberta are getting richer and richer every day - at the expense of the planet. And the Harper government seems to support all of this - at the expense of our failing planet. Bravo Chiquita - nice try! You've made people think about a very serious global issue. Roger Smith, Fleet Challenge Ontario.

Anonymous

Rating
2
21
19
the hell with them,let's use it here, and they can stuff there bananas

J GRONDIN

Rating
2
24
22
Hi ! can they ban there chemical ripping process or there chemical ripping retarder ?? so common that green planet stuff is becoming a tad bit too far , don't get me wrong I take care of the planet as much as I can but there is a limit .

Anonymous

Rating
-2
19
21
Maybe this is all just part of that show the boss from Chaquita was on before. You know where he went undercover in his own company as the average working guy and screwed up everything he tried. Hey chaquita banana I am here to say I don't eat bananas anyway Should I decide I want to eat some Dole can supply me with potasium You'd rather get oil from the mideast That doesn't surprise me in the least Out in the oilsands the have human rights Not like in the mideast where that's the big fight You don't care about that, you've been convicted before For propping up dictators and being their whore

Report Abuse

Video Reel