News: Business Environment
HOT TOPIC: Gravel Haulers Protest Milton MTO Weigh Station VIDEO: How to Haul 800,000 lb. Generator Vessels
1 Comments Share
CSA Scores Are Unreliable, ATA says

ARLINGTON, VA— The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s Compliance, Safety, Accountability program is unreliable and does not effectively evaluate trucking companies’ safety, the American Trucking Associations said in a white paper.

“Researchers have arrived at mixed conclusions with respect to the reliability of SMS scores in identifying unsafe (crash prone) motor carriers. Some found virtually no correlation between scores and crash rates in any of the measurement categories,” the ATA writes.

The CSA system is “plagued by problems” such as lack of data – especially on small carriers who make up the bulk of the industry, differences in regional enforcement, the underreporting of crashes by states, the inclusion of crashes that were not caused by motor carriers and the increased exposure to crashes experienced by carriers operating in urban environments, ATA writes.

In its paper, ATA examined data and research on the connection between CSA scores and crash risk, as well as how problems with the data and methodology produce an imperfect and unreliable measure of a carrier’s safety record.

“ATA continues to support the objectives of CSA and to call for improvements to the program,” said ATA President and CEO Bill Graves. “However, data and methodology problems continue to plague the system and the accuracy and reliability of companies’ scores.”

“It may make sense for FMCSA to use scores in those categories that correlate positively with crash risk to prioritize companies for enforcement review,” Graves said. “In the process, FMCSA can verify whether or not the scores paint an accurate picture. But third parties need to know that for the purposes of drawing conclusions about individual carriers, the scores are unreliable.”

According to research cited by ATA, scores in at least three of the system’s measurement categories don’t bear a positive correlation to crash risk, where the increase of one variable causes the decrease of the other variable. Even in those categories that generally have a positive correlation to crash risk, the paper points out that there are tens of thousands of real-world “exceptions,” carriers with high scores and low crash rates and vice-versa.

To review the full white paper, click here.

 
Email Editor     Comment Below
Rate this Article!
Filed Under: american trucking associations safety trucking
We Recommend:
Popular this Week:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Social Activity


(optional)

(optional)

(optional)

Notify me of other comments on this story (requires email and password)


* Please type the letters above exactly as they appear:  

Please Note:

While we value your feedback, please avoid profane or personal attacks. You should know that if your comment contains libelous, prejudicial or just plain wrong statements, it will be deleted.

truckerdesiree

Rating
1
2
1
Does this also mean that CSA scores for drivers that are in their PSP records are also inaccurate? Seeing how a bad mark for someone else crashing into your rig goes on the truck drivers record. I'd like to see the ATA open the entire CSA conversation, not just for carriers.. the drivers need someone to speak up for them as well.

Report Abuse

Video Reel