A handful of cases have already tested this approach, with varying degrees of success, she says. Clearly, though, lawyers are increasingly winning judgments by claiming carriers are vicariously liable if their drivers are involved in fatigue related accidents -- and more so if drivers are diagnosed with OSA.
"It's kind of a Neverland for carriers because there's enough information out there that suggests this is a problem, so it opens up the question [of liability] if you have such information on a driver and perhaps look the other way."
Even the mistake of "not noticing" could cause the gavel to come down on you. The sort of "information" a carrier is supposed to be alerted to is also open to interpretation. In one case involving a fatality, a judge dismissed a carrier's "sudden emergency" defence even though the driver didn't make the company aware of his OSA condition.
The plaintiffs' lawyer reasoned, and the judge agreed, that a single fatigue-related accident on the driver's abstract should have raised flags. Cash says that any fatigue or health-related communication between the driver (or his family) and the company -- unexplained accidents, dispatch correspondence related to tiredness, or frequent sick days or lateness records -- could convince a judge or jury that a company "should have known."
Fatigue wasn't even an issue in another tragic case in New Mexico where a truck driver suffered a heart attack and struck a road worker after he lost control of his vehicle. Both the trucker and worker died, but that didn't stop the families' lawyers from going after the carrier, arguing that the heart attack was a result of an underlying OSA condition the employer should have been aware of.
Luckily for the company there was little evidence to link OSA and the heart attack, but, if anything, the case shows that plaintiffs' attorneys "are being creative in connecting what dots they can with regard to sleep apnea to get to liability," says Cash. "And now there's a lot more dots for them to follow."
This is all the more reason to move forward quickly on a federal rule that provides clear procedural guidelines for carriers, says Osterberg.
That's not to say trial lawyers won't circle around anyway, but a legal road map drawn up by the feds would better protect carriers who do their due diligence.
TESTING, TESTING
For Canadian-based NAFTA haulers -- as any carrier required to test U.S.-bound drivers for drugs knows all too well -- things could get even more complicated if mandatory OSA testing gets on the books in either country.
Outside of insurance costs, the issue north of the 49th isn't so much crash liability -- claims are usually controlled by legislation and Canadian courts don't hand out the punitive damages the Americans do -- but there are health and safety pitfalls to mind.
Like drug and alcohol dependence, sleep apnea has already been ruled to be a "perceived" disability by Provincial Human Rights Commissions, says Christopher Andree, a partner with mega law firm Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP.
In Dashwood Industries Ltd. v. United Steelworkers of America, an Ontario arbitrator found that OSA was a disability under health and safety legislation, and therefore all the reasonable anti-discrimination rules, including a prohibition on random testing, would apply.
"It would fall in the same category as drug testing," says Andree. "If you tried to test for sleep apnea, you'd face the same kind of challenge that you are perceiving someone to have a disability; and if they do have a real disability you have to accommodate them."
How do you accommodate someone who can't sleep or is constantly fatigued? Andree speculates: "My immediate reaction would be to say, for example, you can't let them keep the same driving hours because they might get tired much faster than someone who gets a normal amount of sleep."
The anti-discrimination angle isn't lost on Angela Cash in regards to U.S. protections. That's why until legislators pass a firm mandate, she recommends that carriers who want to preemptively protect their liability adopt either an "all-in" policy -- screening all drivers regardless of whether they fit the profile for OSA -- or the less expensive, but perhaps riskier approach of addressing drivers on a case-by-case basis, depending on the apparent evidence that a sleep disorder could be a factor.
"You can't just assume that just because someone shares physical characteristics with those who generally test higher for sleep apnea, that you should to test for it," she says.
Taking action in advance of FMCSA legislation surely seems complicated. Plus, any testing and treatment policy involving owner-operators involves putting your foot down on an entirely separate legal minefield. Just ask the carriers in both the U.S. and Canada who have watched courts and arbitrators rule that independent contractors need to be treated like company drivers -- and, in some cases, even unionized -- because the company may have exercised what was deemed to be too much day-to-day control over the owner-ops.
Still, it's apparent that not having any screening and treatment policy at all, even in the absence of a government directive, is a big gamble if your drivers travel on U.S. roadways.
"Quite frankly," says Cash, "with target defendants like trucking companies, unless you can go in there and prove there is absolutely no evidence that you could have known or suspected a driver [involved in a crash] had sleep apnea, then it's very risky because juries want to hold trucking companies responsible because they put people out there behind the wheel of those big rigs.
"I don't think juries will look kindly on trucking companies that in their opinion turn a blind eye."
Montreal trucker Marc Paquin is one big rig operator who's glad his sleep problems, while made plainly apparent once they spilled out on the highway, didn't lead to any serious injuries or land him in a court room before he could get medical treatment and overcome his "enemy."
Sounding a bit like an infomercial, Paquin says, very genuinely: "The results are fantastic. I am alert and energetic all day long.
"If you have several of the symptoms of sleep apnea, you should not hesitate," he says. "The examination lasts one night and your life will be completely changed."
One down. A few hundred thousand to go.
“ Marco... Fabulous Article. I come from a family riddled with Sleep apnea. My mom and brother both use the machine. I went through the test and was diagnosed as a "boarderline" case. However, one night I borrowed my mother's "old" machine and noticed a HUGE difference (so did my wife). I havn't missed a night in over three years. I use the machine because of its personal benefits not because of legislative medical DMV rules. However, I have a huge problem with how some screening takes place. In Manitoba (I'm not sure how they do it in other jurisdictions) a driver is reuired to drive for eight hours down very lonely roads (usually four hours north of Winnipeg and back). They are not allowed: to talk to the evaluator(or anyone else), use the radio, eat sunflowerseeds or anything distrating. It's eight hours of absolute boredom. They judge you by how straight and consistent you stay on the road. I have ADD (as do several others in my family). I use radio (and other things) to control it while I drive. If I would take the test (even now using my machine) I would fail, not because of apnea but because I couldn't keep the vehicle arrow straight for the life of me. The testing meathod is flawed and will cause many to fail for the wrong reasons. I know of one driver who was notified of his test at the last minute and (after a nine hour day) had to take it or loose his lisence. Needless to say, he lost it anyway. There are a lot of land mine issues in this topic that will need to be addressed. ”