New Study says EPA Mandates Underestimated Costs for Trucks
WASHINGTON — The National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) and American Truck Dealers (ATD) released a new report today that calls into question the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) cost analysis of emissions control requirements for model year (MY) 2004-2010 commercial trucks.
According to the report, the mandates resulted in considerably higher prices for commercial vehicles, depressed sales, and delayed the environmental benefits that the EPA originally sought.
In a statement, NADA/ATD noted that very few studies have ever compared the EPA’s cost predictions to the actual cost of meeting its motor vehicle emissions mandate.
Examing the 2004-2010 medium- and heavy-duty truck emissions mandates, the study reveals that "the EPA underestimated actual compliance costs on average by a factor of two to five. It shows what can happen when a regulatory proposal – based on far in-advance predictions – seeks to set mandates far in the future.
"Importantly, the study documents the real-world market disruptions that can occur as a result."
NADA/ATD said that the lessons learned from the report apply directly to the proposed model year 2017-2025 fuel economy regulations for light-duty vehicles.
"That rulemaking, combined with previous Obama administration fuel economy mandates, will raise the average price of a vehicle by $3,000, according to EPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates," NADA/ATD said.
"When faced with unreasonable federal regulatory mandates that increase motor vehicle costs, buyers of light-duty vehicles – similar to what commercial truck buyers experienced – will seek out less expensive alternatives in the marketplace.”
You can view a copy of the report here.
Have your say
This is a moderated forum. Comments will no longer be published unless they are accompanied by a first and last name and a verifiable email address. (Today's Trucking will not publish or share the email address.) Profane language and content deemed to be libelous, racist, or threatening in nature will not be published under any circumstances.