News: Regulations
4 Comments Share
Truck Side Guards Under Scrutiny

TORONTO, ON — Canada’s transport regulator rejected the motion to make side guards mandatory despite Ontario’s chief coroner’s recommendation.

On June 18th, the chief coroner made 14 recommendations upon the completion of a review of 129 cyclists’ deaths since 2006 in Ontario. One of those recommendations was for trucks to be required to have side guards, which he believes will prevent further deaths and injuries. Side guards are also used to improve aerodynamics of trucks.

“We looked at the data that were out there ... and there’s good evidence from the United Kingdom that they’re going to prevent deaths and save lives,” said Dan Cass, deputy chief coroner.

But Transport Canada disagrees, and believes the exact opposite: that there is not sufficient evidence to prove that side guards will reduce or prevent injuries and deaths.

“Based on the data and knowledge Transport Canada currently possesses, the department will not be proceeding with a regulation mandating side guards at this time,” Kelly James, Transport Canada spokesperson, told the Globe and Mail.

The motion to make the side guards mandatory came into existence for the first time after Torontonian cyclist Jenna Morrison died last year in an accident with a truck taking a right turn.

It was later found that Morrison was five months pregnant.

But James also said that although the federal government doesn’t plan to move ahead with the side guards, it will examine the coroner’s report, which may “help inform our approach to improving the safety of all vulnerable road users (pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists) in general,” James wrote in an email.

Provincial and municipal governments have the authority to implement their own truck and trailer regulations within their boundaries but so far none require trucks to have trailer skirts.

Newfoundland and Quebec have got side guards on their government-owned truck fleets.

Some governments have argued that because many trucks run cross country it would be difficult for a single province or municipality to require side guards if the rest of Canada does not.

Transportation Minister Bob Chiarelli told the Globe that although the Ontario Government has not pushed for the mandatory implementation of side guards in the past, it is taking the coroner’s recommendation into account and may rethink its position.

“We will very seriously consider advocating with the federal government that they change the requirements to enable [side guards],” Chiarelli said.

Ontario is expected to release a cycling strategy this summer after closely reviewing the coroner’s report. The strategy includes proposals for new road rules such as a one meter rule for vehicles passing cyclists and mandatory helmets for cyclists of all ages, not just those under 18. The helmet motion is strongly opposed by some members of the cycling community.

 
Email Editor     Comment Below
Rate this Article!
Filed Under: Jenna Morrison truck side guards Transport Canada
We Recommend:
Popular this Week:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Social Activity


(optional)

(optional)

(optional)

Notify me of other comments on this story (requires email and password)


* Please type the letters above exactly as they appear:  

Please Note:

While we value your feedback, please avoid profane or personal attacks. You should know that if your comment contains libelous, prejudicial or just plain wrong statements, it will be deleted.

Anonymous

Rating
9
40
31
Reading this article and the comments I do feel obliged to put my two pennies worth down here, I am originally from the UK and I drove tractor trailers for many years. Firstly I would like to address the difference between the side gaurds and the trailer skirts. Side gaurds are just that a gaurd to stop a car/cyclist/biker or pedestrian from going under the trailer. A trailer skirt is designed with a slighty tougher side panel, firstly to reduce wind resistance and to aid in the prevention of the accidents. I understand the cost implications to companies, but what is the cost of a life??

Teona

Rating
-7
34
41
In reply to Anonymous: Thank you for your comment. I think Transport Canada is rejecting the coroner's suggestion for mandatory side guards for trucks for the same or similar reasons that you have raised. I have not been part of the testing process of the side guards so I can't comment on the guards' effectiveness when it comes to preventing injuries and deaths, but Transport Canada has clearly stated that the evidence does not show the guards would prevent further injuries and death. I think also that everyone has the same goal in the end, which is to make Ontario's streets as safe as possible for all road users in the most effective way there is. No one wants to get in an accident and no one wants to hurt someone else or get hurt themselves. Something has to be done, it just hasn't been decided which course of action works best in this case. It does look like side guards are a controversial issue. Some people feel strongly that the guards would help but some think they aren't the solution. And of course, it would cost a lot of money to have them placed on all trucks. I think what would help decide one way or another is to get the results of the tests on how well (or not) the side guards did when it comes to preventing injury and death. And don't forget the coroner made 14 suggestions, not one. Some people want to pick and choose, they want this but not that but I think to truly make the roads safer we would need to implement not one but multiple of his suggestions. And not overnight, but after we figure out which methods are most effective.

Anonymous

Rating
4
37
33
As a retailer of tractor trailers, I can tell you without a doubt that trailer "side skirts" are solely deigned to reduce drag and increase the aero-dynamic profile of the trailer. They are not designed to prevent objects from going underneath the trailer. They are also designed to flex or "give" should an impact occur, to prevent the "skirts" from being damaged. An example would be in the winter a trailer goes over a snow bank, the "skirts" flex under the trailer to prevent damage to the skirt and the trailer components where the skirts are attached to. You can go on many websites for the manufacturers of these products and they have videos posted of exactly what I am stating. I.e. http://www.transtexcomposite.com/ It is sad and tragic that people have lost their lives, but unfortunately, these products they are trying to make manditory will not prevent this from happening. The truth is we need to take responsibility for our actions, as the human error, whether it be on the drivers part or the cyclist's part, is the root cause of these accidents.

Anonymous

Rating
3
39
36
I'm not really clear on how side guards or side skirts would prevent these tragedies. If you came into contact with a truck while riding a bike or walking for tha matter, doesn't it depend on how you fall? The wheels are the biggest danger and during a turn, where it seems most of these accidents have happened, you would still be run over by the wheels side guards or not wouldn't you? More diligence on everyone's part is probably more effective. I have heard the argument made that this would be a double benefit because if these guards were installed the truck owner would save on fuel also. This is a good talking point but not true given that these accidents happen in the cities and most often with vehicles that operate locally and would not benefit in that regard.

Report Abuse

Video Reel